{"id":4393,"date":"2026-10-19T15:59:06","date_gmt":"2026-10-19T15:59:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/checkthenews.store\/?p=4393"},"modified":"2026-10-19T15:59:06","modified_gmt":"2026-10-19T15:59:06","slug":"charles-and-william-stand-together-on-harry-and-meghans-royal-status","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/checkthenews.store\/?p=4393","title":{"rendered":"Charles and William Stand Together on Harry and Meghan\u2019s Royal Status"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>rince Harry may be finding his way back to his father, but his relationship with Prince William remains as frozen as ever. Since Harry and Meghan Markle returned to England on August 26, 2026, to set up a non-royal home base with their children, that contrast has thrown a spotlight on one issue where the King and his heir stand firmly together \u2014 despite their very different personal ties to Harry, both men agree\u2026<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u2026that Harry and Meghan no longer represent the \u00a0royal family. Harry, 42, and Meghan, 45, stepped back as working royals in 2020 and had been living in Montecito, California, before this summer\u2019s move back to Britain with Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Harry\u2019s contact with his father has resumed to some degree. The two met at Highgrove in July, along with Queen Camilla. No similar meeting or contact has taken place between Harry and William, who remain estranged.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Royal author Russell Myers said the King and the Prince of Wales are aligned regardless of that personal gap. \u201cThe King and William are completely united on the Sussexes not representing the royal family,\u201d Myers said, adding, \u201cIt\u2019s without a doubt how in sync they are on this matter.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">According to Myers, William treats his father\u2019s relationship with Harry as separate from his own. \u201cWilliam\u2019s view is clear \u2014 any relationship his father has with Harry or the Sussexes as a family is entirely up to him,\u201d he said. \u201cBut looking toward the future, he will have no relationship with them, in a working or private capacity whatsoever.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Away from that tension, William and Princess Catherine have kept their attention on family and public duties. Royal commentator Simon Vigar described their approach simply: \u201cIt is keep calm and carry on. They see it as a sideshow and ancient history.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Their September included Prince George beginning his first year at Eton College, along with \u00a0royal engagements such as a joint appearance for a World Suicide Prevention Day event in Liverpool. Former royal press secretary Ailsa Anderson said the couple are \u201cshining a light on things that are important to them\u201d while trying to avoid distraction.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Royal historian Amanda Foreman suggested the pressure will not ease. \u201cIt will be incredibly draining,\u201d she said. \u201cThey will always have to look over their shoulders and factor them in\u2026 they\u2019ll get lots of jabs and questions: \u2018When are you going to make up with your brother?\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The Palace\u2019s Formal Clarification<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">That informal agreement between Charles and William runs alongside a more formal step taken by the King. A letter from the Lord Chamberlain, the most senior official in the royal household, was sent to government and military officials and to Lord Lieutenants around the country, as well as to Harry\u2019s team.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cTo help avoid doubt or confusion, The King has directed that (this) information be shared,\u201d the letter stated. Its central point was that Harry and Meghan remain non-working members of the Royal Family.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The letter reiterated that \u201cin January 2020 the Duke and Duchess stepped down from undertaking representative duties on behalf of the Sovereign, and are no longer working members of the Royal Family.\u201d Their return to the UK has not changed that status.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It also confirmed the Sussexes still cannot use the styles \u201cHis Royal Highness\u201d and \u201cHer Royal Highness\u201d in the manner tied to official duties, and that \u201cthe charitable work of the Duke and Duchess is a personal matter for them both and undertaken in their private capacity.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The communication effectively reaffirms the 2020 Sandringham Agreement and closes the door on a \u201chalf-in, half-out\u201d arrangement that would have let Harry and Meghan combine independent ventures with working royal duties.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Reporting from AP News noted concern among Palace observers that ambiguity around the Sussexes\u2019 position could make them appear like a <strong>parallel royal court<\/strong> now that they are living in Britain again. Palace sources said making the letter public was preferable to having its contents emerge later through leaks.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Surprise Over the Letter\u2019s Timing<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The substance of the letter may not have been unexpected, but its arrival reportedly was. A spokesperson for Harry and Meghan told the BBC they \u201cwere a little surprised not to have been told about this in advance.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">BBC royal correspondent Daniela Relph reported that the couple\u2019s team received the letter roughly an hour before it was released publicly, and that Harry was in a meeting and could not be reached immediately. By the time his representatives responded, publication was already imminent.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Royal sources gave a different version, telling the BBC that Harry and Meghan had in fact been made aware beforehand. The two accounts of how much notice was given differ, though the letter\u2019s public release before any response from the couple is not disputed.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What Remains Unresolved: Security<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Harry and Meghan\u2019s UK return is expected to bring further public visibility. Harry is expected to continue his involvement with the Invictus Games, due to be held in Birmingham in 2027, and there have been reports Meghan could return to acting. Their children are expected to attend school in Britain.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">None of that is barred by the King\u2019s clarification, which instead defines the capacity in which such activities take place \u2014 as private endeavors, not royal ones.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">One issue the letter does not settle is security. Harry has long disputed the level of publicly funded police protection provided to him since leaving working royal life. The letter states plainly that \u201cany operational security issues should continue to be directed to the relevant police authorities.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Those decisions rest with the \u00a0Royal and VIP Executive Committee, known as RAVEC, rather than the Palace itself, meaning the couple\u2019s move back to Britain has not resolved that long-running dispute.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Lord Chamberlain\u2019s letter also directed officials toward Buckingham Palace for related questions: \u201cAny specific questions from official and State organizations about the courtesies which should be extended to the Duke and Duchess, and particularly where recourse to public funds may be required, should be directed to Buckingham Palace.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>rince Harry may be finding his way back to his father, but his relationship with Prince William remains as frozen as ever. Since Harry and Meghan Markle returned to England &hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4393","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"brizy_media":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/checkthenews.store\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4393","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/checkthenews.store\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/checkthenews.store\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/checkthenews.store\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/checkthenews.store\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4393"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/checkthenews.store\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4393\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4395,"href":"https:\/\/checkthenews.store\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4393\/revisions\/4395"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/checkthenews.store\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4393"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/checkthenews.store\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4393"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/checkthenews.store\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4393"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}